SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 Supreme(Mad) 639

V.KANAGARAJ
Vaithinattar – Appellant
Versus
Sakkubai Ammal – Respondent


Advocates:
Yashod Varadhan, for Appellants; V. Raghavachari, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- This Second Appeal is preferred against the judgment and decree dated 23-12-1992 rendered in A.S. No. 123 of 1992 by the Court of Additional Subordinate Judge, Cuddalore, thereby reversing the judgment and decree dated 18-1-1990 rendered in O.S. No. 464 of 1982 by the Court of Principal District Munsif, Kallakurichi.

2. Tracing the history of the above second appeal coming to be preferred by the plaintiff in the suit, what comes to be known is that the respondent has filed the suit for declaration and permanent injunction, wherein the suit property originally belonged to one Fathima Bi; that the plaintiff purchased the suit property with defined boundaries from the original owner, Fathima Bi under a registered sale deed dated 22-9-1969 for a valuable consideration of Rs. 1275/-; that on the date of purchase, the plaintiff took possession of the suit property and is in enjoyment of the same; that the plaintiff would produce a registration copy of the sale deed dated 22-9-1969 and also a kist receipt for payment of kist for patta No. 582 in which the suit property situates; that as per the sale deed, the plaintiff has purchased the suit property measuring 0.05 cents situat






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top