P.K.MISRA
G. Asokan – Appellant
Versus
Neyveli Lignite Corporation – Respondent
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. Since the question raised in the miscellaneous petition is the same as in the writ petition, the writ petition itself is taken up for disposal.
3. Against the petitioner, an order of eviction is said to have been passed under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971. It is said that the petitioner has filed an appeal, which is pending before the District Judge. The amin grievance of the petitioner in the present writ petition is to the effect that even though the petitioner is continuing in possession, the respondents have disconnected the supply of electricity to the premises in question.
4. A counter-affidavit has been filed on behalf of the respondents. The main stand taken in the counter is to the effect that since the petitioner has field an appeal before the District Judge, the present writ petition is not maintainable. It is further contended that disconnection was made in the month of December 200
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.