SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2002 Supreme(Mad) 599

A.RAMAMURTHI
R. Dhanam (deceased by L. Rs. ) – Appellant
Versus
Subadhra – Respondent


Advocates:
M. V. Krishnan, for Appellants; V. R. Gopalan, for Respondents.

JUDGMENT :- The plaintiff in the suit is the appellant.

2. The case in brief is as follows :- The plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of the Agreement of sale. The suit property is a residential building consisting of three portions. The first portion of the building belonged to her husband, the middle portion which is the suit portion of the house was owned by Sundari Ammal and the third portion belongs to the plaintiff absolutely by virtue of the sale deed in her favour dated 29-11-1978. The entire building is in the possession of the plaintiff and she is using the same as her residential house. The plaintiff’s husband has leased out the front portion to a tenant and the tenant is occupying the same and in the middle portion, the plaintiff is residing with her family members. The middle portion required intensive repairs and she wanted the plaintiff to do the repairs and occupy the building as tenant and accordingly, the plaintiff paid a sum of Rs. 300/- as advance rent on 23-11-1996 and spent for the repairs of the building. The total amount spent for the repair work of the building was Rs. 1669.10 and she also maintained accounts. Sundari Ammal had also signed the a












Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top