SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1989 Supreme(Mad) 142

PADMINI JESUDURAI
Muthusamy – Appellant
Versus
S. A. R. Annamalai – Respondent


Advocates:
T. Somasundaram, for Appellants; M. Rosinaidu and V. Narayanaswamy, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- These appeals arise out of an award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal. The parents of the deceased, who have been awarded compensation have filed C.M.A. No.809 of 1982, challenging the finding that the deceased also contributed to the accident and also seek enhancement of compensation together with interest, while the owner of the vehicle has filed A.A.O. No.1103 of 1988, contending that a higher amount should have been deducted, for the negligence contributed by the deceased.

2. Facts briefly are: On 10-7-1980, Balasubramaniam, son of the appellants in C.M.A. No.809 of 1982, aged 6 years and 9 months at the time of his death was knocked down by a taxi bearing registration No. MDY 9599 belonging to the first respondent, insured with the second respondent and driven by the third respondent. Balasubramaniam sustained serious injuries and succumbed them soon after. The vehicle was driven in a rash and negligent manner. The appellants filed M.C.O.P. No.243 of 1980 under S.110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act) in the Court of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (Additional District Judge) Salem, claiming a compensation of Rs. 50






























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top