E.J.BELLIE, NAINAR SUNDARAM, S.T.RAMALINGAM
H. C. Lodha – Appellant
Versus
C. Ranganathan – Respondent
NAINAR SUNDARAM, J. :- There are six revisions arising under the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18 of 1960, hereinafter referred to as the Act. These revisions were heard by learned single Judge of this Court. In C.R.Ps. 382, 383 and 4305 of 1981, Sengottuvelan, J. felt a difficulty with regard to arriving at the market value of the site, in which the building is constructed for determining the fair rent for the building. The learned Judge referred the matter to a Division Bench. The Division Bench which heard the said three revisions on reference, found that of the pronouncements of two learned single Judges of this Court, one of Ratnam, J. in Chelladurai v. Paramanand Jindal, (1980) 2 Mad LJ 441, and the other of Sathiadev, J. in Shamsunnissa Begum v. C.K. Nanjiah, (1980) 2 Mad LJ 9, taking different views a Division Bench in Kaliammal v. Athi V. Ramachandran, (1983) 2 Mad LJ 252, accepted the view of Sathiadev, J. in Shamsunnissa Begum v. C.K. Nanjiah, (1980) 2 Mad LJ 9, Overruling the view of Ratnam, J. in Chelladurai v. Paramanand Jindal, (1980) 2 Mad LJ 441, and opining that the decision of the said Bench requires reconsideration, referred the mat
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.