ORDER :- The above revisions arise out of the order passed by the VI Judge, Court of Small Causes at Madras (Appellate Authority) in R.C.A. 433 of 1983 as against the order of the VIII Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras, (Rent Controller) in HRC 5455 of 1981. C.R.P. 3821 of 1984 is filed by the landlord, hereinafter referred to as the petitioner, challenging the correctness of one finding of the appellate authority and C.R.P.1018 of 1985 is filed by the tenant, hereinafter referred to as the respondent, challenging the correctness of another finding in the same order of the same appellate authority.

2. The facts giving rise to the present revisions briefly are as follows - The proceedings related to a house bearing door No. 4 (old door No. 102) in Portuguese St, 7th Lane, Madras 1. The petitioner filed an application under S.10(2)(i) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 18 of 1960, as amended by Act 23 of 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) on the averment that it was the owner of the superstructure in the petition premises, that the respondent was its tenant, that the respondent had committed wilful default in the payment of rent from April, 19