FAKKIR MOHAMMED
R. Govindarajan – Appellant
Versus
Madurai Corporation – Respondent
JUDEMENT :- The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal and the appeal has been filed against the concurrent findings of both the courts below to the effect that the enhancement of tax fixed by the Madurai Municipal Corporation who is the respondent herein from the second half year 1970-71 is correct and is not ultra vires and illegal.
2. The plaintiff filed the suit for declaration and consequential injunction alleging that the respondent had indiscriminately enhanced the property tax from Rs. 272.12 to Rs. 507.52 per half year from the second half year 1970-71 and then to Rs. 583-16 from the second half year 1971-72 and to Rs. 696-76 from 1973 without any proper basis overlooking the protest made by the appellant and that the defendant had not adopted the principle or the method of fixing the annual rental value prescribed by the Tamil Nadu Rent Control Act. The respondent resisted the suit on the ground that the suit is barred under S.495 of the Corporation Act and that the assessment has been made after compliance with the provisions of the said Act.
3. Both the courts below have, relying upon the decision reported in the Guntur Municipal Council v. Guntur Town
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.