SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1983 Supreme(Mad) 302

FAKKIR MOHAMMED
R. Govindarajan – Appellant
Versus
Madurai Corporation – Respondent


Judgement

JUDEMENT :- The plaintiff is the appellant in this second appeal and the appeal has been filed against the concurrent findings of both the courts below to the effect that the enhancement of tax fixed by the Madurai Municipal Corporation who is the respondent herein from the second half year 1970-71 is correct and is not ultra vires and illegal.

2. The plaintiff filed the suit for declaration and consequential injunction alleging that the respondent had indiscriminately enhanced the property tax from Rs. 272.12 to Rs. 507.52 per half year from the second half year 1970-71 and then to Rs. 583-16 from the second half year 1971-72 and to Rs. 696-76 from 1973 without any proper basis overlooking the protest made by the appellant and that the defendant had not adopted the principle or the method of fixing the annual rental value prescribed by the Tamil Nadu Rent Control Act. The respondent resisted the suit on the ground that the suit is barred under S.495 of the Corporation Act and that the assessment has been made after compliance with the provisions of the said Act.

3. Both the courts below have, relying upon the decision reported in the Guntur Municipal Council v. Guntur Town










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top