SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Mad) 48

RATNAM
Meyyappa Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
K. N. Balakrishnan – Respondent


Advocates:
N. C. Raghavachari and K. V. Subramaniam, for Petitioners, Advocate General, for Respondents.

Judgement

ORDER :- The tenants against whom the authorities below have passed an order for eviction on the applications filed by the respondents in these civil revision petitions under S.14 (1) (b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 18 of 1960, as amended by Act 23 of 1973 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), are the petitioners herein. The premises in question are adjacent non-residential buildings situate in N.S.B. Road, Tiruchirapalli in the occupation of the petitioners. Admittedly, the respondents in these civil revision petitions who are related as son and father are the owners of these buildings and the petitioners have been in occupation on payment of a monthly rent of Rs. 50. According to the respondents, their buildings in the occupation of the petitioners are old and aged more than 60 years and no repairs have been done. Claiming that the buildings in the occupation of the petitioners are situate in a commercially busy locality and that if the existing buildings are demolished and new constructions are put up with all modern amenities, they will fetch a good income and stating that they are possessed of sufficient means to undertake the project of d



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top