SWAMIKKANNU
Iyyam Perumal – Appellant
Versus
Chinna Gounder – Respondent
ORDER :- It is contended on behalf of the revision petitioner/second defendant- judgment-debtor, referring to the decision in Jolly George Verghese v. Bank of Cochin, AIR 1980 SC 470 at p. 471, which has been followed by this Court in the decision rendered by Balasubrahmanyan, J. in Anuma Gounder v. Ponnusami, (1981) 2 Mad LJ 229) : (AIR 1982 Mad 81) and bearing in mind the observation of the Supreme Court as well as the decision arrived at by this Court, whew the grievance of the revision petitioner is dealt with, certainly it would be seen that the order now impugned is revisable under Sec. 115, C. P. C. It is further contended, that the order pronounced by the lower Court on 25-1-1982 in R. E. P. 195 of 1981 in O. S. 201 of 1981, on the file of the learned District Munsif, Mettur Dam, the petition filed by the respondent herein plaintiff-decree-holder under O.21, Rules 11 and 32 and 38 of the Civil P. C., for arrest of the revision petitioner herein for recovery of Rs. 3,876-40 being the decree amount and costs, is certainly revisable, because, on the day of hearing of the said petition, the revision petitioner herein went late to the Court and the said belated appearan
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.