SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1984 Supreme(Mad) 127

RATNAM
Kuppurajammal – Appellant
Versus
Meenakshi Ammal – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Sengottian, for Petitioner, M. Srinivasan, for Respondents.

Judgement

ORDER :- The plaintiff in O. S.No. 341 of 1964, Sub Court, Coimbatore is the petitioner in this civil revision petition, which is directed against the order of the Court below passed in E. A. No. 1703 of 1981 in I. A. 685 of 1980 in I. A. 136 of 1978 in O. S.341 of 1964, allowing the application filed by the respondent herein under Ss. 148 and 151, C. P. Code, praying that the delay in depositing the sum of Rs. 8,384 for payment to the petitioner be excused and time for such payment be enlarged. On 28-8-1968, the petitioner obtained a preliminary decree for partition and separate possession of her one-tenth share in the suit properties. The respondents herein filed I. A. 685 of 1980 in O. S.341 of 1964 praying for the appointment of a Commissioner for the division of Item 1 of the suit properties into ten equal shares by metes and bounds and for suggesting the manner of allotment and to pass a final decree thereafter. While that application was pending, a joint petition was filed by the respondents herein and the first defendant in O. S.341 of 1964 praying that by consent of parties, a final decree may be passed. Pursuant to this, on 9-7-1980, a compromise final decree was
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top