SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1982 Supreme(Mad) 287

K.B.N.SINGH
T. E. Ramanatha Rao – Appellant
Versus
K. Janardhanan – Respondent


Advocates:
T.S. Subramaniam, for Petitioner.

Judgement

ORDER :- In this case, the question of maintainability of this petition arises. The civil revision petition has been filed under S.25 of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (Tamil Nadu Act 18 of 1960 as amended by Tamil Nadu Act 23 of 1973) (hereinafter referred to as the Act) against the appellate judgment dated 22-1-1980 of the Second Judge, Court of Small Causes, Madras, made in H.R.A. No. 315 of 1979. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appellate judgment was rendered on 22-1-1980, that he applied for a copy on 24-1-1980, that stamps were called on 12-2-1980, that stamps were deposited on 14-2-1980 that the copy was ready on 17-4-1980 and that the copy was actually delivered on 18-4-1980. According to the calculation made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the last date for filing the civil revision petition under S.25 of the Act was 15-5-1980 which would fall during the summer holidays of this court which started from 1-5-1980 and the court reopened on 16-6-1980. The revision petition was not filed on the date of reopening of this court namely, 16-6-1980, but was actually filed on 9-7-1980. According to the learned counsel, as





Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top