SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Mad) 293

RAMANUJAM, SETHURAMAN
Ranganathan – Appellant
Versus
K. Gangabai – Respondent


Advocates:
K. N. Balasubramanian and T. Dhyanakumar, for Appellant; M. Francis Rayar and T. M. Saminathan, for Respondents.

Judgement

RAMANUJAM, J. :- This appeal has been filed by the claimant in M.A.C.T.O.P. No.12 of 1977, on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Pondicherry. against the order rejecting the claim on the ground that the claimant in the claim petition being the father of the deceased is not a legal representative and as such he cannot maintain the claim petition for the dealth of his son in an accident.

2. On 17-3-1977 at about 4.30 p.m. at Cuddalore main road, opposite to the A. F.T. New Mills at Mudaliarpet, Pondicherry lorry bearing registration number PYS 7857, belonging to the first respondent and insured with the second respondent, dashed against one Shivkumar, aged about 6 years, resulting in his instantaneous death. Alleging that the said fatal accident was due to the rash and negligent driving of the lorry by its driver, the father of the deceased filed the said claim petition M.A.C.T.O.P. 12 of 1977, claiming a compensation of Rs. 30,000/-, from the

owner, the insurer and the driver of the vehicle who had been respectively added as respondents 1 to 3 in the claim petition.

3. The said claim petition was resisted by all the three respondents. Their defence was that the



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top