SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Mad) 63

RAMANUJAM, SENGOTTUVELAN
National Insurance – Appellant
Versus
Mahadevayya – Respondent


Advocates:
N. Rosi Naidu and B. Sivakumar, for Appellant; R. Sitaraman and V. Sambandemurthy, for Respondents.

Judgement

RAMANUJAM, J. :- This appeal has been filed by the insurer as against the award passed by the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Madras, in O. P. 284 of 1975. On 17-3-1975, one Basavanniah along with some of his friends, was making some purchases in the Evening Bazar. At that time, an auto-rickshaw bearing registration No.TMZ 6631, belonging to one Mrs. Chandra and insured with the second respondent, came at a high speed and knocked him down. He sustained head injuries and became unconscious. Immediately he was removed to the General Hospital. Later he succumbed to the injuries on 21-3-1975. On the ground that the driver of the auto-rickshaw was rash and negligent and the accident had occurred due to that rash and negligent driving, the widow and the children of the deceased, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, Madras, claiming compensation of Rs. 40,000.

2. The claim was opposed by the owner of the auto-rickshaw, the first respondent and the insurance company, the second respondent with which the auto-rickshaw was insured. The stand taken by them was that the accident occurred solely due to the negligence of the deceased in that he suddenly cro





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top