SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1981 Supreme(Mad) 345

SHANMUKHAM
State Industries Promotion Corporation of TN. Ltd. , Sipcot – Appellant
Versus
Arvind Distillery and Chemicals Ltd. , Madras – Respondent


Advocates:
G. Rajan, for Applicant, T. Raghavan, for Respondents.

Judgement

ORDER :- The interesting question, which may often come up for consideration and which is involved in this application, is whether the suit for recovery of the amount due on a mortgage of property situated outside the territorial jurisdiction of this Court, is a suit for land.

2. Appln. No.1974 of 1981 is by the plaintiff for leave to institute this suit on the allegation that as the title deeds were deposited at Madras, the part of cause of action arose within the local limits of this Hon'ble Court's ordinary original jurisdiction and that notwithstanding the property being outside the local limits, the suit is not for land. The application is laid under Cl.12 of the Letters Patent. The said provision reads as follows :-

12. Original jurisdiction as to suits-

And we do further ordain that the said High Court of Judicature at Madras, in exercise of its ordinary original civil jurisdiction, shall be empowered to receive, try, and determine suits of every description if, in the case of suits for land or other immovable property such land or property shall be situated, or, in all other cases, if the cause of action shall have arisen, either wholly, or, in case the leave of the








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top