SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 135

RAMANUJAM, SETHURAMAN
Rani Leela Kumari – Appellant
Versus
S. Zamberlal – Respondent


Advocates:
A.K. Sriraman, for Appellants; Srivatsamani, for Respondent.

Judgement

SETHURAMAN, J.:- The plaintiffs in O.S. No. 1907 of 1971, on the file of the City Civil Court, Madras, are the appellants. The first plaintiff died after filing the suit and plaintiffs 2 to 6 are his legal representatives and it is they who are the appellants herein. The first plaintiff pledged with the defendant, a pawn broker, valuable jewels described in the pawn ticket No. A. 6685 dated 22-3-1970, as security for a loan of Rs. 30,000 taken on that day. On 25-4-1970 the first plaintiff paid to the defendant a sum of Rs. 11,000. and the same was endorsed and acknowledged by the defendant on the pawn ticket itself. There was thus a balance of Rs. 19,000, which had to be repaid with interest at 12% per annum. The first plaintiff claimed that he approached the defendant to pay the sum of Rs. 19,000, with interest, but the defendant refused to deliver the jewels to him and to receive the amount from him. The first plaintiff, therefore, came forward with the suit for redemption of the pledged jewels on payment of the sum of Rs. 21,090 and for a permanent injunction restraining the defendant from bringing the pledged jewels to sale by public auction.

2. The defendant resisted t


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top