SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 260

Madras High Court
PADMANABHAN
Official Assignee, Madras - Appellant
Versus
Inspector-General of Registration, Bangalore - Respondent
Decided On : 07/09/1980

Advocates:
Applicant in person; N.R. Chandran, for Respondent; Advocate-General, for the State.

Section 115 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act exempts all transfers, mortgages, or assignments of insolvent's property wherever situate from stamp duty or other duty whatsoever.

Headnote:

PRESIDENCY TOWNS INSOLVENCY ACT - STAMP DUTY - EXEMPTION - SALE DEED EXECUTED BY OFFICIAL ASSIGNEE - WHETHER LIABLE TO STAMP DUTY - PRESIDENCY TOWNS INSOLVENCY ACT, S. 115 - KARNATAKA STAMP ACT, 1957.

Fact of the Case:

The Official Assignee sold a factory building and land belonging to an insolvent in Kolar, Karnataka, in a public auction. The highest bidder, M/s. Usha Telehoist Ltd., presented the sale deed for registration before the Sub-Registrar, Kolar, who refused to register it without payment of stamp duty.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the sale deed executed by the Official Assignee in favor of the 2nd respondent of the factory buildings and land situate in Kolar within the Karnataka State is exempt from stamp duty under S.115 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act.

Issues: Whether the sale deed executed by the Official Assignee in favor of the 2nd respondent of the factory buildings and land situate in Kolar within the Karnataka State is liable to be exempted from stamp duty or not.

Ratio Decidendi: The court interpreted Section 115 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act to mean that all transfers, mortgages, or assignments of insolvent's property wherever situate, within the Presidency Towns or outside, shall be exempt from stamp duty or other duty whatsoever.

Final Decision: The court allowed the application and directed the Inspector General of Registration, Bangalore, to effect the registration of the sale deed executed by the Official Assignee in favor of the 2nd respondent without payment of stamp duty.

Judgement

ORDER :- Messrs Della Technical Service represented by its partners were adjudicated insolvents on its own petition by the order of this Court dated 8-7-1977. Consequent on the vesting of the property in the Official Assignee, the factory building and land belonging to the insolvent and situate at Kumberahalli, Kasba Hubli, Kolar taluk, bearing S.N. 33/1, measuring about 2 acres and 11 guntas were sold in public auction by the Official Assignee. The 2nd respondent herein, M/s. Usha Telehoist Ltd., was the highest bidder in a sum of Rupees 1,70,000/-. Hence, the sale was confirmed in favour of the 2nd respondent. Accordingly, the Official Assignee executed a sale deed in favour of the 2nd respondent. The 2nd respondent presented the sale deed for registration before the Sub-Registrar, Kolar in Karnataka State. The Sub-Registrar, Kolar, refused to register the same on the ground that no stamp duty had been paid on the sale deed. The Sub-Registrar, Kolar, took the view that the registration of the sale deeds of properties situate within the Karnataka State was governed by the provisions of the Karnataka Stamp Act, and inasmuch as the Karnataka Stamp Act does not contain any provision for exemption of stamp duty in cases of sales by the Official Assignee the document was liable to be stamped. In the circumstances, the Official Assignee has sought for the issue of necessary direction being issued to the Inspector General of Registration, Bangalore, to effect the registration of the sale deed executed by the Official Assignee in favour of the 2nd respondent.

2. The Inspector-General of Registration, Bangalore, the 1st respondent herein, has filed a counter-affidavit. He has contended that the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act is not applicable to any area other than Presidency Towns and therefore is not applicable to the State of Karnataka. The transaction is governed by the provisions of the Karnataka Stamp Act, 1967. The said Act does not provide for any exemption being granted in favour of the sale deed executed by the Official Assignee.

3. The short question that arises for consideration is whether the sale deed executed by the Official Assignee in favour of the 2nd respondent of the factory buildings and land situate in Kolar within the Karnataka State is liable to be exempted from stamp duty or not. I have heard the arguments of the learned Advocate-General of Madras to whom notice was issued by this Court, Mr. N.R. Chandran on behalf of the Inspector-General of Registration, Bangalore, Mr. Dandapani for the 2nd respondent and the Official Assignee.

4. Section 115 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act provides as follows :

''Every transfer, mortgage, assignment, power of attorney, proxy paper, certificate, affidavit, bond or other proceedings, instrument of writing whatsoever before or under any order of the court and any copy thereof, shall be exempt from payment of any stamp or other duty whatsover."-

5. It is therefore clear on the language of S.115 of the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act that in the case of a transfer of a property that is vested with the Official Assignee, no stamp duty need be paid as per the provisions of the Stamp Act. But the contention advanced on behalf of the Inspector-General of Registration, Bangalore, is that the Presidency Towns Insolvency Act is not applicable to the State of Karnataka. There is nothing in the Act to say that the provisions of the Act do not extend to areas situate outside the Presidency towns. Therefore, when S.115 speaks of a transfer by the Official Assignee, under orders of this Court, it can only mean transfer of the property of the insolvent which had vested with the Official Assignee. Therefore, on the face of it, S.115 takes within its ambit the transfer of properties of the insolvent wherever situate and which has become vested with the Official Assignee consequent on the order of adjudication. In this view, the transfer effected by the Official Assignee of a proper



Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top