SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1980 Supreme(Mad) 81

BALASUBRAMANYAN
D. Kannan – Appellant
Versus
Southern Roadways – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Gangaram Prasad, for Petitioner; A.R. Ramanathan, for Respondent.

Judgement

ORDER:- Kannan, the petitioner, was involved in a road accident in which he was knocked down by a motor vehicle belonging to the Southern Roadways. The accident happened on 21-4-1976. Kannan sustained injuries as a result of the accident. The injuries were as follows - one tooth was broken and other teeth began shaking. There was a head injury. There was a fracture of the head bone. There were other multiple injuries in the body. The petitioner filed a petition under Section 110-A of the Motor Vehicles Act, before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal, complaining that the lorry belonging to the Southern Roadways was driven in a rash and negligent manner resulting in his being knocked down and sustaining multiple injuries. He claimed in this petition an aggregate compensation of Rs.8,000 under various heads. In his petition he described in detail the nature of the several injuries which he sustained in the accident. However, when it came to asking for compensation under named heads of claim, he did not make any particular claim as compensation for any permanent disability in his body as a result of the accident.

2. The claim of compensation in the manner aforesaid was resiste

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top