SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Mad) 187

BALASUBRAMANYAN
D. Rajapathi – Appellant
Versus
University of Madurai – Respondent


Advocates:
Kumar Rajaratnam, for Appellant; S. Palaniswami, for R. Thiagarajan, K.C. Srinivasan and K.S. Narasimhan, for Respondents.

Judgement

JUDGEMENT :- The facts giving rise to this civil miscellaneous appeal may be briefly stated. The University of Madurai had obtained the State Government's permission to raise building for staff quarters at Madurai. The actual work of construction of the buildings and their supervision were with the Directorate of Technical Education, Technical Division, Madras which is a department of the State Government. Rajapathi, the appellant in this civil miscellaneous a peal, is an Assistant Engineer, Public Works Department, Madras. It was part of his duty to supervise the construction of the staff quarters in the Madurai University, for he was attached, in that capacity, to the office of the Directorate of Technical Education. For going on official inspection duty, the appellant was given the use of a jeep belonging to the University. The driver of the jeep, however, was an employee of the State Government under the control of the Director of Technical Education, Madras.

2. One day at about 7 a.m. the appellant travelled in this jeep to go to some place in connection with his inspection duty. The vehicle was driven by the department's driver. On the way, the vehicle met with an acc











Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top