SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Mad) 173

RATNAM
D. Nataraja Achari – Appellant
Versus
Balambal Ammal – Respondent


Advocates:
N. Sivamani and N. Krishna Mitra, for Appellant; A.S. Udayasankar, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGEMENT :- The first defendant in the suit is the appellant in this second appeal which arises out of the final decree proceedings in a suit for partition instituted by the first respondent herein in O.S. No. 2423 of 1961, on the file of learned 5th Assistant judge, City Civil Court, Madras.

2. The facts are not in dispute. The first respondent instituted the suit for partition and separate possession of her - share in the property mentioned in the schedule to the plaint or in the alternative for a moiety thereof and also for an account of the income collected by the appellant and for the appointment of Receiver and other incidental reliefs. By a preliminary decree dated 24-12-1963, the first respondent herein was granted a decree for partition in respect of a half share of the suit property and clause (2) of the preliminary decree provided that the first respondent shall also be at liberty to apply for the ascertainment of the income from the property and the allotment of her share therein.

There was an appeal against this preliminary decree in A.S. No. 201 of 1964 to this court, which was disposed of on 9-9-1970 with certain modifications. Pursuant to the preliminary dec


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top