SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1979 Supreme(Mad) 464

RAMAPRASADA RAO
Mookkammal – Appellant
Versus
Chitravadivammal – Respondent


Judgement

JUDGEMENT :- This appeal is against the judgement and decree of the Principal, Subordinate Judge, Tirunelveli, who allowed an appeal and decreed a suit for partition filed by a daughter as against the purchaser of the property described as a dwelling house of the family. The defence of the purchaser was that the plaintiff as the female member of the family cannot ask for partition of the dwelling house in view of the special provision in Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. This found favour with the trial court which apparently overlooked the fact that it was the male member who was the other half sharer who sold the dwelling house to a third party. The trial court dismissed the suit. On appeal, the Principal Subordinate Judge reversed the judgement and held that the suit was maintainable and granted a preliminary decree for partition.

2. Section 23 of the Hindu Succession Act 1956 appearing in the chain of Sections of the codified Hindu Law is intended to respect one of the ancient Hindu tenets which treasured the dwelling house of the family as an impartible asset as between a female member and a male member. In order to perpetuate that memorable intention of Hi








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top