SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Mad) 472

NAINAR SUNDARAM
Rajalakshmi Ammal – Appellant
Versus
S. S. Piramanayagam Pillai – Respondent


Judgement

ORDER :- The two petitioners in this revision, as 'landlords' within the meaning of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, Act 18 of 1960. (hereinafter referred to as the Act), sought the eviction of the respondent-tenant herein by invoking the aid of S.10(3)(a)(iii) of the Act. According to them, they purchased the premises in question for the purpose of running a jewellery business run by their husbands, which business having been started by their husbands as partners under the name and style of 'Ameer Jewellery Mart' is being run in another premises which is not their own. The Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Tirunelveli, who entertained the petition of the landlords in HRC No. 43 of 1972, found the case tenable on facts and countenanced their plea for eviction of the tenant and allowed the petition for eviction. The tenant filed an appeal, C.M.A. No. 24 of 1973, which was heard and disposed of by the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge) Tirunelveli, and the Appellate Authority set aside the orders of the Rent Controller and dismissed the petition for eviction by the 'landlords' on a reasoning that the premises in which













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top