NAINAR SUNDARAM
Rajalakshmi Ammal – Appellant
Versus
S. S. Piramanayagam Pillai – Respondent
ORDER :- The two petitioners in this revision, as 'landlords' within the meaning of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, Act 18 of 1960. (hereinafter referred to as the Act), sought the eviction of the respondent-tenant herein by invoking the aid of S.10(3)(a)(iii) of the Act. According to them, they purchased the premises in question for the purpose of running a jewellery business run by their husbands, which business having been started by their husbands as partners under the name and style of 'Ameer Jewellery Mart' is being run in another premises which is not their own. The Rent Controller (Principal District Munsif), Tirunelveli, who entertained the petition of the landlords in HRC No. 43 of 1972, found the case tenable on facts and countenanced their plea for eviction of the tenant and allowed the petition for eviction. The tenant filed an appeal, C.M.A. No. 24 of 1973, which was heard and disposed of by the Rent Control Appellate Authority (Principal Subordinate Judge) Tirunelveli, and the Appellate Authority set aside the orders of the Rent Controller and dismissed the petition for eviction by the 'landlords' on a reasoning that the premises in which
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.