SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Mad) 363

P.S.KAILASAM, BALASUBRAMANYAN
D. Chelliah Nadar – Appellant
Versus
G. Lalita Bai – Respondent


Judgement

KAILASAM, C. J. :- The plaintiffs are the appellants in this Letters Patent Appeal. The plaintiffs sued for a declaration of their title to and possession of the suit properties and for an injunction. Plaintiffs 1 and 2, Chelliah Nadar and Mercy Bai, are husband and wife. The first defendant, Lalitha Bai, is the sister of the first plaintiff. The second defendant Muthayyan is the husband of the first defendant. The suit properties belonged to one Daniel Nadar, the deceased father of the first plaintiff. Daniel Nadar died as a Travancore Christian leaving behind him his son, the first plaintiff, and four daughters, including the first defendant. The contest is between the son and the daughter of Daniel, Nadar. If the Christian Succession Act of Travancore is applicable, the first plaintiff will be the sole heir. But, if the Indian Succession Act is applicable, the first plaintiff and the first defendant would each be entitled to a half share in the properties.

2. The trial court found that the Indian Succession Act governed the parties to the suit and dismissed the suit. On appeal, the learned District Judge of Kanyakumari held that the first plaintiff was not entitled to cl























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top