SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Mad) 15

BALASUBRAMANYAN
V. Ramaswami Naidu – Appellant
Versus
Syndicate Bank – Respondent


Advocates:
A. Vedantam, for Appellants; S. Sampathkumar and A.P.S. Kasturirangan, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGMENT :- The Syndicate Bank, which is the respondent in this appeal, obtained a decree against the appellants for payment of Rs. 1,50,766-89 and costs, on a charge of 4000 shares in Pankaja Mills Ltd., and 101 shares in Pioneer Fertilisers Ltd. To execute the decree aforesaid, the Bank filed E. P. No. 380 of 1975 in the Sub-Court, Coimbatore for attachment and sale of the judgment debtors properties. But the properties sought to be proceeded against in execution were not the joint stock company shares mentioned in the decree as a charge, but were quite different. They consisted of an item of immoveable property which was a cinema house called "Central Theatre"and various item of machinery, furniture and fittings therein. The judgment-debtors resisted the execution. They submitted that the Bank should not be allowed to proceed against the Central Theatre before exhausting the remedy against the shares over which the decree had declared a charge.

2. The learned Subordinate Judge took the view that for executing the decree in this case the decree holder was not restricted to the charged properties alone. According to the learned Subordinate Judge, the decree-holder was at l
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top