SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1978 Supreme(Mad) 61

NAINAR SUNDARAM
Pappu Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Lab Chemicals – Respondent


Advocates:
G.V. Baluswami and Asif Ali, for Petitioner; S.V. Kumaraswami, A.L. Natarajan and M.A. Srinivasan, for Respondents.

Judgement

ORDER :- In these revisions, the landlady is the petitioner. The matters arise out of rent control petitions filed by the landlady under S. 14 (1) (b) of the Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act (hereinafter referred to as the Act). H. R. C. No. 2270 of 1971 was filed by the landlady against Messrs. Lab Chemicals, the respondent in C. R. P. No. 430 of 1975. H.R. C. No. 2271 of 1971 was filed by the landlady against P. S. Palani Chetti respondent in C. R. P. No. 440 of 1975. Both were entertained by the Eighth Judge, Court of Small Causes (Rent Controller), Madras. According to the petitioner she required the premises in the occupation of the respective tenants for the immediate purpose of demolishing the same and such demolition is to be made for the purpose of erecting a new building on the site of the building sought to be demolished. The case of the petitioner as could be gathered from the petitions filed before the Rent Controller, was that her husband was doing business in Ceylon; for some years there have been threats against the Indian merchants in that country to leave; her husband was able to prolong his stay there till recently when he, had to migrat


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top