SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1977 Supreme(Mad) 537

ISMAIL
State Trading Corporation of India – Appellant
Versus
K. V. Vaidyalingam – Respondent


Advocates:
R. Subramaniam, for King and Partridge, for Petitioners.

Judgement

ORDER :- The petitioner who was the plaintiff in O. S. No. 720 of 1975, on the file of the learned First Additional Subordinate Judge, Coimbatore, instituted the suit against five defendants, and the fourth defendant was dead even on the date when the suit was instituted. Subsequently, the petitioner filed I. A. No. 736 of 1976 under O. XXII R. 4 and S. 151, C. P. C. to implead the legal representatives of the said fourth defendant. On that application being opposed, the trial court dismissed the same. It is against the dismissal of the said application, the present civil revision petition has been filed.

2. The suit was filed on 3-11-1975 while the fourth defendant had died even on 19-8-1975. Consequently, the suit was filed against a dead person as far as the fourth defendant was concerned. A suit against a dead person is admittedly a nullity. Therefore, as far as the fourth defendant was concerned, it was as if no suit whatever had been filed. If so, O. XXII, R. 4, C. P. C cannot be invoked for the purpose of impleading the legal representatives of the fourth defendant as parties to the suit.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner, relying on the decision of this court

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top