NAINAR SUNDARAM
Lakshmana Chetty – Appellant
Versus
M. S. Askar Ahmed – Respondent
ORDER :- The defendant in O. S. No. 183 of 1973 on the file of the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Vellore is the petitioner. The first respondent filed a suit to recover the amount due on a promissory note dated 12-2-1970 executed by the defendant in favour of the second respondent viz., Abdulla Basha Sahib. The second respondent is said to have assigned the said promissory note in favour of the first respondent on 23rd April 1973. The defendant filed a written statement contending that the promissory note was executed towards the sale consideration of a sale deed dated 11th February 1970 and since he could not get possession and he was injuncted by the Court from taking possession, the consideration on the promissory note must be deemed to have failed and in any event the plaintiff is not a holder in due course. On the basis of the above findings issues were framed and issues 1 to 3 read as follows :-
1. Whether the suit pronote was executed for the purchase of the property as alleged by the defendant?
2. Whether the agreement between the original payee and the defendant as pleaded by
the defendant is true, valid and enforceable?
3. Whether the assignment of the pronote in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.