SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1976 Supreme(Mad) 440

RAMAPRASADA RAO, RATNAVEL PANDIAN
Pauline Lucas – Appellant
Versus
Jerome Pascal – Respondent


Judgement

RAMAPRASADA RAO J.:- The short question in this appeal is whether the Hindu Succession Act, 1956, which was extended to the State of Pondicherry has to prevail in the matter of succession to the estate of a Christian which is claimed by the heirs who are still Christians.

2. The plaintiff is the son of Pascal Theodore and the defendant is one of his daughters. The plaintiff filed the present suit for a declaration that he is entitled to succeed as the sole heir of Pascal Theodore to the exclusion of his sister and prayed for the necessary reliefs. The defendant, however, on the prima facie assumption that after the induction of the Hindu Succession Act 1956 into the State of Pondicherry, she would also be entitled as one of the class I heirs, resisted the claim. The following issues were framed:

1. What is the success oral law applicable to the parties?

2. Whether according to that law the plaintiff is the sole heir of his deceased father Theodore Pascal; and

3. What relief the parties are entitled to? The learned Judge found that under provisions of the Hindu Succession Act itself the law of succession applicable to the parties to the litigation is the Hindu Customary law pr










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top