SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1975 Supreme(Mad) 37

Madras High Court
VEERASWAMI,NATARAJAN
Manojah Cine Productions - Appellant
Versus
A.Sundaresan - Respondent
Decided On : 01/21/1975

Registration of copyright is not a condition precedent to the subsistence of copyright or acquisition of ownership thereof under the Copyright Act, 1957.

Headnote:

COPYRIGHT - REGISTRATION - NOT A CONDITION PRECEDENT - COPYRIGHT ACT, 1957, SECTIONS 13, 14, 15, 16, 45, 48.

Fact of the Case:

The plaintiff filed a suit for infringement of copyright in his Tamil story "Nazhuval." The defendant contended that the suit was not maintainable because the plaintiff had not registered his copyright. The trial court held that registration was not a condition precedent to the subsistence of copyright.

Finding of the Court:

The High Court upheld the trial court's decision. It held that the Copyright Act, 1957, does not require registration as a condition precedent to the subsistence of copyright or acquisition of ownership thereof. The court noted that Section 48 of the Act provides that the Register of Copyrights shall be prima facie evidence of the particulars entered therein, but this does not mean that registration is compulsory.

Issues: Whether registration of copyright is a condition precedent to the subsistence of copyright or acquisition of ownership thereof under the Copyright Act, 1957.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that registration of copyright is not a condition precedent to the subsistence of copyright or acquisition of ownership thereof. The court noted that the Copyright Act, 1957, does not require registration as a condition precedent to the subsistence of copyright or acquisition of ownership thereof. The court also noted that Section 48 of the Act provides that the Register of Copyrights shall be prima facie evidence of the particulars entered therein, but this does not mean that registration is compulsory.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal.

Judgement

VEERASWAMI, C. J.:- This appeal comes before us from an order of Maharajan, J. on a preliminary issue in a suit brought by the first respondent for certain reliefs on an alleged infringement of his copyright in a Tamil story "Nazhuval" written by him. He asked for a permanent injunction restraining the appellant from exploiting a film 'Iru Malargal' which, according to the first respondent, was a reproduction of his story. In addition to the relief of injunction, he also asked for damages. An additional issue was settled to the effect - "Whether the plaintiff's suit is not maintainable for non-registration of his copyright in the story `Nazhuval'?"

2. It seems to us that the view of Maharajan, J. is correct. We have carefully looked into the Copyright Act, 1957, and nowhere in it do we find any justification for holding that registration is a sine qua non or a condition precedent to the subsistence of copyright or acquisition of ownership thereof or reliefs for infraction of copyright. Mishra Bandhu Karyalaya v. S. Koshal, AIR 1970 Madh Pra 261, took a contrary view but, with due respect, we are unable to agree with it. The Copyright Act, 1957, amended and consolidated the law relating to copyright. Chapter III relates to copyright. Section 13 lists out work in which copyright may subsist, as for instance original literary, dramatic, musical and artistic works, cinematograph films and records. Sub-section (1) of Section 13 states in which case copyright shall not subsist subject to exceptions. Section 14 is important which defines copyright. `Copyright' means the exclusive right in one or other of the works specified in the sub-section. This is, of course, copyright by virtue of and subject to the provisions of the Act. Section 15 declares that no copyright shall subsist in any design registered under the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911. Sub-section (2) of this section deals with a particular design which is capable of being registered under the Indian Patents and Designs Act, 1911, but, which has not been so registered. Such design shall cease as soon as any article to which the design has been applied has been reproduced more than 50 times by an industrial process by the owner of the copyright or, with his licence, by any other person. Then we have Section 16 which makes it clear that there shall be no copyright except as provided in the Act. Copyright, therefore, is a creation of the statute. Might be that it originally subsisted under the common law. But has been replaced by the statute law and copyright subsists as provided by the Copyright Act, 1957, and by virtue of and subject to its provisions. No person under Section 16 shall be entitled to copyright or any similar right in any work, whether published or unpublished, otherwise than under and in accordance with the provisions of the Act or of any other law for the time being in force. Chapter IV deals with ownership of copyright and the rights of the owner, Chapter V with term of copyright, Chapter VI with licences, Chapter VII with performing rights of societies and Chapter VIII, with rights of Broadcasting authorities. We have then Chapter IX dealing with international copyright. Registration of copyright is dealt with by Chapter X. It provides for the procedure for registration of copyright. A register shall be kept for that purpose and entries in the register shall be made of copyrights. A system of index should be maintained. Form and inspection of register are contemplated. Section 48 which seems to throw considerable light on the question we have to decide, is this :

"The Register of Copyrights shall be prima facie evidence of the particulars entered therein and documents purporting to be copies of any entries therein, or extracts therefrom certified by the Registrar of Copyrights and sealed with the seal of the Copyright Office shall be admissible in evidence in all Courts without further proof of production of the original."

Power is given to the R







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top