JUDGMENT :- Defendants are the appellants. The suit was for ejectment on the allegations that the plaintiff-trust is the owner of the suit property, that the first defendant is a monthly tenant under the plaintiff, that the first defendant, according to the lease, should vacate after 30 days, notice, that no improvement had been made by the defendants as to claim compensation at the time of vacating, that to the notice issued the first defendant replied denying the tenancy, that thereupon a fresh notice dated 26-1-1968 was issued determining the tenancy and that the second defendant has been impleaded as a party as the first defendant has transferred the lease to him. The plaintiff no doubt denied the alleged transfer and also denied any practice in respect of chatram properties, alleged by the defendant.

2. The first defendant contended that he transferred the lease to the second defendant on 21-11-1967, which has been recognised by the plaintiff, that compensation has to be paid for the improvement made and that the lease is a permanent one and cannot be terminated, particularly against the wish of the creator of the trust who wanted to benefit his relations. The first de