SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Mad) 256

RAMAPRASADA RAO
Raju – Appellant
Versus
L. Kumaramuthu – Respondent


Advocates:
C.L. Vijayaraghavan for K. Raman, for Petitioners.

ORDER :- The legal representatives of the first defendant who died during the pendency of the suit in O. S. No. 117 of 1968 on the file of the court of the District Munsif of Nagapattinam are the petitioners. The plaintiff-respondent filed the suit for recovery of a sum of Rs. 896-30 on the foot of dealings had by him as a maligai merchant. On the foot of the accounts maintained by the plaintiff said to be in the usual course of business, he claimed a sum of Rs. 751-25 from the first defendant when he was alive for dealings between 1-4-1957 and 24-4-1965. He claimed interest at six per cent per annum on the balance so struck by him in his books of account. The first defendant admitted the dealings, but pleaded that a portion of the claim in any event is barred by limitation. The learned District Munsif found that the suit having been filed on 8-3-1968, transactions referable to a period of three years prior to such institution alone were in time and he accordingly decreed the suit for a sum of Rs. 27/- with proportionate costs and dismissed the balance of the claim. On appeal, the learned District Judge reversed the decision of the learned District Munsif and held that the account


Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top