SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Mad) 41

RAMANUJAM, V.RAMASWAMI
Karuppanna Thevar (died) – Appellant
Versus
Rajagopala Thevar – Respondent


Advocates:
D. Ramaswami Iyengar and R. Krishnamachari, for Appellants, M. R. Narayanaswami, for Respondents.

Judgement

V. RAMASWAMI, J. :- The first defendant is the appellant. The suit was filed by respondents 1 to 4 for partition and separate possession of their 4/5th share in the plaint schedule properties which consisted of two items. The first item is a pucca house bearing door No. 3/135 and comprised in T. S. 10/2191 of Kattur village in Coimbatore town. The second item is given as vacant site measuring 51 cents forming part of T. S. 1771/1-A and situate in Pankaja Mills Road, Coimbatore. The appellant and respondents 1 to 4 are brothers, the appellant being the eldest. The respondents in their plaint stated that they and the first defendant have been living for a considerable time separately each following his own avocation and calling but they have not divided the joint family properties by metes and bounds. Item 1 in the schedule is the ancestral family house in which the plaintiffs are living separately with their own families in different portions. The first defendant has also retained for his own use a portion of the said item. Item 2 is a vacant site measuring 51 cents situate in Pankaja Mills Road. The first defendant appears to have put up some tiled flimsy structures in som






Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top