SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1974 Supreme(Mad) 227

ISMAIL
State of T. N. – Appellant
Versus
P. Kanagamani – Respondent


ORDER :- ISMAIL, J.

These Writ Petitions raise a common question. Having regard to the nature of the question raised, it is not necessary to refer to the facts in detail and it is enough, if the broad facts are stated for the purpose of appreciating the question raised. Manali village in Chingleput Taluk, Chingleput District, was an inam village which became an estate under the Tamil Nadu Estates Land Act, 1908 by virtue of the Tamil Nadu Estates Land (Third Amendment) Act, 1936 (Tamil Nadu Act XVIII of 1936). For the purposes of the Madras Refineries Ltd., a major portion of the lands in the said village was notified to be acquired under the provisions of the Land Aquisition Act. 1894, hereinafter referred to as the Act. The notification under Section 4 (1) of the Act was published in all these cases in the Tamil Nadu Government Gazette on 3-2-1965. The declaration under Section 6 of the Act was published in the Gazette on 9-6-1965. Under the provisions of Section 17 (1) of the Act, possession was taken on different dates even before the passing of the award.

2. The Tamil Nadu Legislature had enacted the Tamil Nadu Inam Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari) Act, 1963 (Tam





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top