SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Mad) 706

RAMANUJAM
Rajamani Ammal – Appellant
Versus
Bhoorasami Padayachi – Respondent


Advocates:
T.R. Ramachandran and T.K. Rajagopalan, for Appellant; V. Krishnan and P. Veeraraghavan, for Respondents.

JUDGEMENT :-

RAMANUJAM, J.

The plaintiff is the appellant. She filed a suit for a declaration of her title to the suit properties consisting of 8 items and for possession of the same from the defendants with mesne profits. The plaintiff claimed that the suit properties originally belonged to her mother Alamelu Ammal, she having purchased the same with her own funds from one Venkatachala Padayachi under a sale deed Ex. A.2 dated 8-4-1935 for a sum

of Rs. 500, that the plaintiff has become the stridhana heir of her mother, and that as the plaintiff was a minor at the time of her mother's death her father Kannusami Padayachi and after his death the first defendant, her brother, had been managing the suit properties on her behalf. The plaintiff alleged that neither her father, Kannusami Padayachi nor her brother, the first defendant, had any right or interest over the suit properties, but that taking advantage of the fact that the plaintiff had just attained majority, the first defendant obtained a registered release deed Ex. A.7, dated 7-9-1957, by exercise of coercion and undue influence. The plaintiff's case is that the said, release deed Ex. A.7 is void an















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top