JUDGEMENT :-

RAGHAVAN, J.

The defendants are the appellants. The above second appeal arises out of O. S. 347 of 1965 filed for declaring the plaintiff's title to the suit property and for possession. The above suit was tried by the trial Court along with O. S. 612 of 1965 filed by the first defendant in O. S. 347 of 1965 for redemption of a simple mortgage executed by the plaintiff to secure a loan of Rs. 1000 on the security of the house and ground covered by O. S. 347 of 1965. The two suits were heard together. I shall now take up the allegations in O. S. 347 of 1965 out of which the above second appeal has arisen. The plaintiff claims title under a sale deed dated 3-4-1964 executed by one Fatima Bi in her favour and the allegation in the plaint is that the first defendant was occupying the B schedule property which is a portion of the A schedule property as a tenant under her vendor (Fatima Bi) from 1961 on a monthly rent of Rs. 10, that the said first defendant failed to pay the rent after her purchase and further denied her title and set up title in herself to the entire A schedule propert

Click Here to Read the rest of this document