SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Mad) 428

RAMANUJAM
Thirumathi Ramayammal – Appellant
Versus
Thirumathi Mathummal – Respondent


JUDGEMENT :- Defendants 1, 3 and 4 in O. S. No. 72 of 1967 on the file of the District Munsif, Dindigul are the appellants. The first and second plaintiffs in the suit, claiming to be the third wife and daughter respectively of the second defendant, filed the suit for declaration of their title to the suit properties and for a permanent injunction restraining the appellants from interfering with their possession and enjoyment of the same. They claimed title to the suit properties on the basis of a family arrangement said to have been entered into and evidenced by Ex. A.1 dated 25-5-1964, between the second defendant, the then owner of the suit properties, the plaintiffs and the appellants. According to the plaintiffs the suit properties have been given to them absolutely under the family arrangement and that the appellants to whom other properties have been allotted under the said family arrangement have been wrongfully asserting title to the suit properties and interfering with their possession.

2. The appellants resisted the suit contending that they were not willing parties to the said family arrangement, that their thumb impression have been obtained in Ex A.1 by deceit and that


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top