SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1973 Supreme(Mad) 433

Madras High Court
VENKATARAMAN,MAHARAJAN
P.Shanmugham - Appellant
Versus
Madras Motor and General Insurance Co.Ltd. - Respondent
Decided On : 08/18/1973

The Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal has the power to issue a commission for the examination of witnesses under Section 110-C(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, which grants the Tribunal all the powers of a civil court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and enforcing the attendance of witnesses. This power includes the lesser power to have the witnesses examined on commission.

Headnote:

MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL - POWER TO ISSUE COMMISSION - SECTION 110-C(2) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1939 - INTERPRETATION - SCOPE AND APPLICABILITY - IMPLIED POWERS - DOCTRINE OF IMPLIED POWERS - APPLICATION TO TRIBUNAL'S JURISDICTION - ORDER XVI, RULE 19, C.P.C. - APPLICABILITY TO TRIBUNAL'S PROCEEDINGS - CONSTRUCTION AND INTERPRETATION.

Fact of the Case:

Petitioners, claimants 3 to 6 in a claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Coimbatore East, filed an application under Order XXVI, Rule 4 and S. 151, Civil P.C. for the issue of a commission to examine witnesses at Madras. The application was filed for compensation for the loss of life of persons and injuries to one of the petitioners. The District Judge declined to issue a commission on the ground that the applicability of the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code to an enquiry is limited and there is no special provision which gives power for the issue of a commission for examination of witnesses.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal has the power to issue a commission for the examination of witnesses. The court interpreted Section 110-C(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, which grants the Tribunal all the powers of a civil court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and enforcing the attendance of witnesses, to include the power to issue a commission. The court also applied the doctrine of implied powers, holding that the power to enforce the attendance of witnesses includes the lesser power to have the witnesses examined on commission.

Issues: 1. Whether the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal has the power to issue a commission for the examination of witnesses? 2. Whether Section 110-C(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, grants the Tribunal the power to issue a commission? 3. Whether the doctrine of implied powers can be applied to the Tribunal's jurisdiction?

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the Tribunal has the power to issue a commission for the examination of witnesses based on the following reasoning: - Section 110-C(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, grants the Tribunal all the powers of a civil court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and enforcing the attendance of witnesses. - The power to enforce the attendance of witnesses includes the lesser power to have the witnesses examined on commission. - In cases where the witness resides more than 200 miles away from the place of the sitting of the Tribunal, the power to enforce the attendance of witnesses may not be available due to Order XVI, Rule 19, C.P.C. In such cases, the power to have the witness examined on commission is implied. 2. The court interpreted Section 110-C(2) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, to include the power to issue a commission based on the following reasoning: - The power to enforce the attendance of witnesses is a larger power than the power to have the evidence of witnesses recorded on commission. - The lesser power of having the evidence of a witness taken on commission must be held to be included within the larger power of enforcing the attendance of a witness. 3. The court applied the doctrine of implied powers to the Tribunal's jurisdiction based on the following reasoning: - Where an Act confers a jurisdiction, it impliedly also grants the power of doing all such acts or employing such means as are essentially necessary to its execution.

Final Decision: The court allowed the revision petition and directed the Tribunal to issue a commission for the examination of the witnesses.

Judgement

KAILASAM, J. :- This petition is filed by claimants 3 to 6 in A claim petition before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Coimbatore East, The claimants filed an application under Order XXVI, Rule 4 and S. 151, Civil P.C. for the Issue of a commission to examine witnesses at Madras. The petition was filed for compensation for the loss of life of persons and injuries to one of the petitioners. The petitioners claimed to be the heirs of two of the deceased. The application was taken for the issue of a commission to examine four medical officers and one nurse, all stationed at Madras, to speak with reference to the treatment given to Rukmani, who sustained injuries in the accident and for which compensation had been asked for In the petition. The Insurance Company filed a counter statement attacking the maintainability of the application and stating that the respondents would be put to much expenses and inconvenience if the witnesses were to be examined at Madras. The District Judge has declined to issue a commission on the ground that the applicability of the provisions of the Civil Procedure Code to an enquiry is limited and there is no special provision which gives power for the issue of a commission for examination of witnesses. The revision petition is filed against the said order. On the merits there could be no doubt that it is desirable that a commission is issued otherwise there would be unnecessary expense and the time of the doctors will be taken up which is avoidable if a commission is issued.

2. On behalf of the petitioners it is submitted that the power conferred on the tribunal under Section 110-C of the Motor Vehicles Act is wide enough to include the power to issue a commission. Section 110-C(2) of the Act runs as follows :

"The Claims Tribunal shall have all the powers of a Civil Court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and of enforcing the attendance of witnesses and of compelling the discovery and production of documents and material objects and for such other purposes as may be prescribed and the Claims Tribunal shall be deemed to be a Civil Court for all purposes of Section 195 and Ch. XXXV, Criminal Procedure Code, 1898."

The other purpose contemplated in the section is found in Rule 18 of the Madras Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Rules, which provides -

"The following provisions of the first Schedule to the C.P. Code, 1908, shall so far as may be, apply to proceeding before the Claims Tribunal, O. V. Rr. 9 to 13, and 15 to 30 : Order IX. Order XIII, Rules 3 to 10; Order XVI, Rules 1, 2, 21; Order XVII and O. XXIII, Rr. 1 to 3." Rule 18 does not include Order XXVI which relates to issue of a commission by Civil Courts. The power, if any, will have to be looked for in Section 110-C of the Motor Vehicles Act. Section 110-C (2) provides that the Claims Tribunal shall have all the powers of a Civil Court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and enforcing attendance of witnesses. No other clause in the section is applicable and therefore may be left out of account. The question is whether all the powers of a Civil Court for the purpose of taking evidence on oath and enforcing attendance of witnesses would include the power to issue a commission. Normally, the powers of taking evidence on oath by a Civil Court would comprise the powers under the relevant rules in Order X, Order XVI and Order XVIII. All the powers that a Civil Court can exercise for the purpose of taking evidence and enforcing attendance of witnesses on oath are admittedly conferred on the tribunal. The question is whether that will include a power to issue a commission to examine a witness.

3. Under Order XXVI, Rule 4, C.P.C., a commission may be issued to any court, not being a High Court, within the local limits of whose jurisdiction such person resides, or to any pleader or other person whom the court issuing the commission may appoint. When such commission is issued, the court receiving the commission under Order XXVI. Rul













































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top