SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Mad) 543

RAMANUJAM
Papammal (died) – Appellant
Versus
K. Kuppuswamy – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Ramalingam, for Appellants; T. R. Ramachandran and T. R. Rajagopal, for Respondent.

JUDGMENT :- The defendants in O. S. No. 278 of 1964 on the file of the Sub-Court, Coimbatore, are the appellants. The respondent-plaintiff filed the suit for a declaration that his mother Poovathal had acquired a vested interest in the suit properties under the terms of the will dated 12-12-1929 executed by his maternal grandfather, one Ramana Gounder, that he has inherited the said vested right on the death of his mother and that the will dated 4-8-1964 executed by the first defendant in favour of the second defendant as though she had an absolute right over the property was not valid and binding on him.

2. The defendants resisted the suit contending that the will dated 12-12-1929, executed by Ramana Gounder gave an absolute right to the first defendant in the suit properties, that the first defendant could dispose of the same by her will dated 4-8-1964, and that the plaintiff had not acquired any vested interest in the suit properties under the will of Ramana Gounder.

3. The trial court held that the plaintiff did not acquire any vested interest under the will of Ramana Gounder dated 12-12-1929. The lower appellate court, however, disagreed with the trial court and passed a decree

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top