JUDGMENT :- The plaintiff in O. S. 13 of 1967 on the file of the District Munsif, Padhmanabhapuram, is the appellant. The above suit is for a declaration of the plaintiff's title and possession of the suit properties (S.Nos.140-B and 165-B) charged for the performance of Dharmams, and for issue of a permanent injunction against defendants 2 to 4 restraining them from interfering with the plaintiff's possession. The suit properties along with S.No.165-A, according to the plaint, stood charged for the performance of Dharmam in possession of the plaintiff's forefathers, that after them, the plaintiff has been in enjoyment of the same, that the plaintiff originally leased out to the first defendant in 1962 item (1) 140-B, 165-B and 165-A that the patta for the said lands stood in the name of the Ambalam that the plaintiff has been enjoying the aforesaid properties doing the Dharmams out of the income therefrom, that the fourth defendant claiming to be a heir of Kaliamma Valliamma created a number of documents throwing a cloud on the plaintiff's possession and enjoyment, that the claim of the fourth defendant that she alone is the trustee in possession of the suit properties is false, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document