SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Mad) 17

RAMAMURTI, MAHARAJAN
Bhoona Bi – Appellant
Versus
Gujar Bi – Respondent


Advocates:
Vedantachari and M. I. Meera Sahib, for Appellants; P. S. Srisailam, for Respondent.

Judgement

MAHARAJAN, J. :- This appeal, which has been preferred by the defendant, is directed against the judgment of the learned Second Additional Subordinate Judge, Tiruchirapalli, in O. S. 160 of 1962.

2. The suit properties originally belonged to one Abdul Sathar, who died on 17-12-1960, leaving him surviving his mother Gujar Bi alias Hamida Bi (the plaintiff-respondent) and his wife Bhoona Bi (the defendant-appellant). Under Ex. B-l dated 13-11-1953, that is to say, about 7 years before his death, Abdul Sathar gifted items 1 and 2 of the plaint A schedule properties in favour of his wife. Under Ex. B-2, dated 21-10-1959, that is to say, about one year and two months before his death, Abdul Sathar gifted items 3 and 4 of the plaint A schedule and other properties in favour of his wife. The donee accepted the gifts, took delivery of possession of the gifted properties, collected rents therefrom and paid tax therefor. After the death of Abdul Sathar, however, his mother instituted a suit in forma pauperis for partition and separate possession of her 3/4th share in the properties on the basis that Abdul Sathar died possessed of these properties, without making any reference in the

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top