KRISHNASWAMY REDDY
Manicka Mudaliar – Appellant
Versus
Munilakshmammal – Respondent
2. The plaintiff who is the respondent herein filed a suit for partition and separate possession of her l/6th share in the suit properties. A preliminary decree Was passed on 14-3-1962 declaring that the plaintiff was entitled to a l/6th share in the suit properties. Clause 6 of the preliminary decree inter alia provided that the plaintiff's share in future mesne profits would be determined in the final decree proceedings. A final decree was passed on 28-2-1964. Clause 12 of the said decree provided that the question of mesne profits is left to be decided in a separate proceedings while the other matters provided under the preliminary decree were settled under the final decree.
3. The plaintiff filed an application under Order 20, Rule 12, C.P.C. to hold an enquiry in regard to mesne profits. This application was resisted by the defendants on the main ground that as the final decr
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.