SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Mad) 39

Madras High Court
KAILASAM
P.Subramaniam - Appellant
Versus
S.Pachamuthu - Respondent
Decided On : 01/19/1972

Advocates:
N. C. Raghavachari, N. S. Varadachari and K. Ramachandran, for Petitioner; K. Sarvabhauman and S. Narayanan, for Respondents.

The Election Tribunal does not have the jurisdiction to disqualify a person from holding office as a member of a Panchayat on the ground that he had not attained the age of 21.

Headnote:

ELECTION LAW - PANCHAYAT ELECTION - DISQUALIFICATION - AGE - VALIDITY OF INCLUSION IN ELECTORAL ROLL - REVISION OF ELECTORAL ROLL - RIGHT TO VOTE - ELECTION TRIBUNAL'S JURISDICTION.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, who was elected as the President of a Panchayat, was challenged on the ground that he had not attained the age of 21 on the date of nomination. The Election Tribunal disqualified the petitioner on this ground.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the Election Tribunal did not have the jurisdiction to disqualify the petitioner on the ground that he had not attained the age of 21. The court found that the petitioner's name had been properly included in the electoral roll and that there was no provision in the Panchayat Act that enabled the Election Tribunal to go into the question of whether a person, whose name was found in the electoral roll, could be disqualified on the ground that he had not attained the age of 21.

Issues: 1. Whether the Election Tribunal had the jurisdiction to disqualify the petitioner on the ground that he had not attained the age of 21. 2. Whether the petitioner's name had been properly included in the electoral roll.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the Election Tribunal did not have the jurisdiction to disqualify the petitioner on the ground that he had not attained the age of 21 because there was no provision in the Panchayat Act that enabled the Election Tribunal to go into the question of whether a person, whose name was found in the electoral roll, could be disqualified on the ground that he had not attained the age of 21. 2. The court found that the petitioner's name had been properly included in the electoral roll because it had been included in accordance with the provisions of the Panchayat Act.

Final Decision: The court allowed the revision petition and set aside the order of the Election Tribunal.

ORDER :- The question that arises in this petition is whether a person who had been a voter in the roll of panchayat and had been elected as the President of the Panchayat could be disqualified by the election court on the ground that on the date of nomination he had not attained the age of 21. So far as the fact whether the petitioner has attained the age of 21 on the date of nomination, there is now no dispute for the findings of the lower court that the petitioner had not attained the age of 21 cannot be seriously disputed. Therefore the question arises whether on the finding that the petitioner had not attained the age of 21 years on the date of nomination and whether after his being elected as the President, he could be disqualified by the Election Court.

2. The preparation of the electoral roll for the panchayat is by incorporating the electoral roll for the assembly constituency, so far as the village, is concerned.

3. Article 326 of the Constitution provides that "the elections to the House of the People and to the Legislative Assembly of every State shall be on the basis of adult suffrage; that is to say, every person who is a citizen of India and who is not less than 21 years of age on such date as may be fixed in that behalf by or under any law made by the appropriate Legislature and is not otherwise disqualified under this Constitution or any law made by the appropriate Legislature on the ground of non-residence, unsoundness of mind, crime or corrupt or illegal practice, shall be entitled to be registered as a voter at any such election." The one specific requirement under this Article is that the person should not be less than 21 years of age. Therefore, the inclusion of the petitioner's name in the Assembly roll is not in accordance with the requirement of Article 326 of the Constitution of India. The provisions that relate to the preparation and publication of electoral roll and qualification for inclusion therein are incorporated in S.20 of the Panchayats Act. Section 20 (1) as amended under Tamil Nadu Act 6 of 1968 is that every person who is qualified to be included in such part of the Electoral roll for any Assembly constituency as relates to the village or town or any portion of the said village or town shall be entitled to be included in the electoral roll for the Panchayat, and no other person shall be entitled to be included therein. Whatever the position might have been before the amendment after the amendment only persons that are entitled to be included in the electoral roll are those who are qualified to be included and the section also provides that no other person shall be entitled to be included therein. This section would therefore disentitle the person to be included in the roll of the Panchayat unless he is qualified to be included in the Assembly roll and therefore the inclusion of the petitioner's name in the electoral roll of the Panchayat is not in accordance with Section 20 (1) of the Act.

4. Having thus found in favour of the respondent, the question arises as to how and when the electoral roll could be revised or modified. Section 20 (2) enables the authorised officer to prepare and publish in such manner and at such times as the Government may direct, the electoral roll for the panchayat. The proviso to this section states that no alteration to the electoral roll shall be published after the last date for filing of nomination and before the notification of the results of election. The explanation provides that "the power conferred by this sub-section on the person so authorised shall include the power to omit in the manner and at the times aforesaid, from the electoral roll for the Panchayat published under this sub-section the name of any person who is dead or who is disqualified to be included in such part of the electoral roll for any Assembly constituency as relates to the village or town or any portion of the said village or town". Sub-section (2) to Section 20 therefore enables the a













Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top