SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1972 Supreme(Mad) 783

RAGHAVAN
Deivasigamani Udayar – Appellant
Versus
Rajarani Ammal – Respondent


Advocates:
R. S. Venkatachari, for Petitioner; M. N. Sundararajan, for Respondent.

ORDER :- The husband who has been directed to pay interim maintenance to his wife is the petitioner herein. The wife filed O. S. No. 288 of 1970 in the Subordinate Judge's Court, Cuddalore under Section 18 of the Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Act, 1956 against her husband for separate residence and maintenance on the ground that she and the defendant were leading a happy married life till the beginning of 1969, that the defendant unlawfully contracted a second marriage on 18-6-1970, that she preferred a complaint under Section 494, Indian Penal Code in C. C. No. 290 of 1970 before the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Villupuram and the respondent was convicted for the offence of bigamy and that ever since the husband has been adopting an unnatural attitude and is extremely antagonistic in his behaviour towards her and that it is practically impossible for her to live with her husband any longer. On these allegations, the wife claimed maintenance at Rs. 1000/- a month. She also filed I. A. No. 331 of 1971 for interim maintenance at the same rate. The husband in his counter contested the claim of the wife for separate residence and maintenance and he also contended that she is not entitl








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top