SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Mad) 252

ALAGIRISWAMI
Reginald Danieal – Appellant
Versus
Sarojam – Respondent


Advocates:
S. Padmanabhan, for Appellant; T. R. Ramachandran and T. R. Rajagopalan, for Respondents.

Judgement

ORDER :- This appeal arises out of an application under S. 25, Guardians and Wards Act, filed by the appellant for the custody of his son from the first respondent, his wife. The appellant's case was that on 19-11-1966 his son, aged six years, was taken away by the first respondent and is living with the second respondent her father. The first respondent contended that on 11-11-1966 the appellant came home fully drunk, beat her and dragged her out of the house and later left the house for good, that what he did upset her mentally and as the appellant did not return to the house till 19-11-1966, she had to leave the house. Her case further was that the appellant has taken to another woman by name Gomathi and he is unfit to be the guardian of the child. The lower court took the view that the point that arose for consideration was whether it was in the interests of the minor to hand over the custody of the child to the appellant and in order te determine that point it had further to decide whether the petitioner has taken to another woman by name Gomathi and married her. The lower court was of the view that the appellant had married Gomathi and that it was not in the interest


























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top