SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Mad) 288

NATESAN
Ameer Bibi – Appellant
Versus
Chinnammal – Respondent


Advocates:
N.K. Ramaswami and S. Sundaram Iyer, for Appellant; K. Sarvabhauman and T.R. Mani, for Respondents.

JUDGEMENT :- The parties to this litigation are a Muslim mother and her two daughters. The eldest of the two daughters is the plaintiff; the mother is the first defendant and the other daughter figures as the second defendant. In 1928, the first defendant for herself and as guardian of her then minor daughters instituted a suit O. S. No. 148 of 1928 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Madurai town, for partition of their shares in certain properties and secured under the decree in the said suit for herself and her daughters the southern portion of a house and 3.34 acres of nanja land. There, have been some alienation of the properties thus obtained. The present suit has been instituted by the elder daughter for partition and separate possession of the remaining properties, the house described as item 1 in the plaint schedule and an extent of 1.20 acres of land described as item 2 in the plaint schedule. The shares of the parties are 16/39 each for the plaintiff and the second defendant and 7/39 for the mother, the first defendant. The plaintiff claims the mother' s share in item 1 under a sale deed Ex. A-2 dated 2-4-1942. The plaintiff therefore prays for partition and separa
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top