Madras High Court
VEERASWAMI,NATKSAN
K.Shanmugham Pillai - Appellant
Versus
S.Shanmugham Pillai - Respondent
Decided On : 11/10/1966
HINDU LAW - REVERSIONERS - ALIENATION BY WIDOW - FAMILY ARRANGEMENT - RATIFICATION - DOCTRINE OF ELECTION - APPLICABILITY - HINDU SUCCESSION ACT (30 OF 1956), S. 14.
Fact of the Case:
The widows of a Hindu, who died in 1926, executed a registered document styled "Agreement of peaceful settlement" with his step-brother and his sons, acknowledging the will of the deceased and disclaiming all further and future interest in the properties to be retained by the widows. The widows subsequently settled the properties they got under the family settlement on their foster daughter and her husband. The step-brother and his sons also acquired properties under the family arrangement. The reversioners, including the plaintiffs, who were the sons of the step-brother, filed a suit for recovery of possession of the properties, claiming that the Hukdarship of the Charity endowed by the deceased had devolved on them on the opening of the reversion. The trial court upheld the plaintiffs' claim in respect of the charity properties but dismissed the suit in regard to the other properties.
Finding of the Court:
The High Court held that the doctrine of election applied to the case and that the plaintiffs were precluded from asserting their rights in the properties after the reversion opened and they became the actual reversioners to the estate of the deceased. The court found that the plaintiffs had ratified the transactions evidenced by the family arrangement and the settlement deeds executed by the widows, and had benefited themselves by the election. The court also held that the dedication of the charity properties was not a complete dedication and that the properties indicated for the charity retained their original private and secular character, while being charged with the expenses of the charity.
Issues: 1. Whether the doctrine of election applied to the case and whether the plaintiffs were precluded from asserting their rights in the properties after the reversion opened and they became the actual reversioners to the estate of the deceased? 2. Whether the dedication of the charity properties was a complete dedication or whether the properties indicated for the charity retained their original private and secular character, while being charged with the expenses of the charity?
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The doctrine of election applies to cases where a person left to himself of his own free will to do one thing or another binds him to the choice which he has voluntarily made, and is founded on the equitable doctrine that he who accepts benefit under instrument or transaction of his choice must adopt the whole of it and renounce everything inconsistent with it. The court exercising jurisdiction in equity will bind him to his election and preclude him from going behind the same. 2. The dedication of the charity properties was not a complete dedication and the properties indicated for the charity retained their original private and secular character, while being charged with the expenses of the charity.
Final Decision: The appeal filed by the defendants was allowed and the suit was dismissed in its entirety with costs. The appeal filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed with no costs.
NATESAN, J. : These two appeals arise out of the suit O. S No. 13 of 1959, on the file of the Subordinate Judge's Court of Tirunelveli, filed by the reversioners to the estate of a Hindu who died on 31-12-1926. The plaintiffs claimed recovery of possession of the properties, specified in Sch. I and IV of the plaint, with past and future mesne profits.
2. It is the common case of the parties that the properties detailed in Sch. I are properties endowed for Annadhana Chatram Charity, and the claim of the plaintiffs is that the Hukdarship of the Charity has on the opening of the reversion, devolved on them. The trial court has upheld the plaintiffs' claim in respect of Sch. I, and dismissed the suit in regard to Sch. IV properties. The aggrieved defendants have preferred A.S. No. 245 of 1961 in respect of Sch. I properties, and the plaintiffs have by A.S. 530 of 1961 appealed in regard to Sch. IV properties.
3. The following pedigrees give the relationship of the principal persons, who had dealt with or have been parties to transactions relating to the properties, or have figured as parties in this litigation.
4. Ramalingam Pillai in the above pedigree II, who died about the close of the year in 1898 had considerable properties, but no issue, and his younger brother Kuppa Pillai had died in August 1894, leaving his two daughters Palani Achl Ammal and Pichai Ammal II (in pedigree I) Ramalingam Pillai and Kuppan Pillai had married sisters and Ramalingam Filial brought up these two daughters of hit younger brother Kuppan Pillai. He got Palani Achi Ammal married to V Rm. Shanmugharri Pillai. his maternal uncle Vairavanatha Pillai's son by his first wife: and Pichai Ammal II was also later got married to this V. Rm Shanmugham Pillai V. Rm Shanmueham Pillai was associated with Ramalingam Pillai in his business and Ramalingam Pillai, who had acquired vast properties executed a settlement deed Ex. A 2 dated 29-9-1898 settling his properties principally on Palani Achi Ammal and Pichai Ammal and her husband Shanmugham Pillai. He gave some properties to his deceased wife's sister's son, Srhramania Pillai Under the settlement deed he endowed the plaint I Sch properties. excepting item 4, for the Annadhana Charities which he was carrying on and made Shanmugham Pillai hukdar, the hukdarship to be hereditary in the family of Shanmugham Pillai. He died shortly after the settlement, and V. Rm. Shanmugham Pillai further added to the wealth he had inherited, and acquired for the charities item 4 of I Sch. of the plaint also. He had no issue, and we find that on the 19th December 1926 he first executed a Will, by the dispositions under which considerable properties would have gone to his step-brother Shanmugham Pillai, viz., his father's second wife's son, referred to as vendor Shanmugham Pillai he was a stamp vendor. This is a registered will. This will was later, on the 29th December 1926, cancelled by a registered instrument, the Sub-Registrar, attending the registration in the residence of Shanmugham Pillai. V Rm. Shanmugham Pillai died on 31-12-1926. presumably, intestate. In January 1927, the two widows, heirs under the Hindu Law of Shanmugham Pillai, impleaded themselves in pending court proceedings as heirs of their husband according to law and the enjoyment of his properties according to Hindu law.
5. Then comes the most crucial document in the case, Ex B. 2 a registered document styled "Agreement of peaceful settlement". This agreement is between the two widows of V. Rm Shanmugham Pillai, Palani Achi Ammal and Pichai Ammal on the one hand, and his step-brother Vendor Shanmugham Pillai above referred to for himself and as guardian of his then two minor sons, Shanmugham Pilial and Vairavanatha Pillai present plaintiffs 1 and 2, on the other. Subramania Pillai the husband of Irulammai, a step sister of V. Rm. Shanmugham Pillai, and Irulammai herself were also parties to the document along with vendor Shanmugham Pillai. Sankaralingam Pill
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.