SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1967 Supreme(Mad) 140

Madras High Court
M. ANANTANARAYANAN,RAMAKRISHNAN,NATESAN
Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Madras, Referring Officer - Appellant
Versus
Sudarsanam Picture, Madras-18 - Respondent
Decided On : 03/31/1967

Advocates:
Addl. Govt. Pleader, for the Referring Authority; R. Janardhanarao, for Respondent as amicus curiae.

The instrument in question is not a mortgage deed as defined in the Indian Stamp Act.

Headnote:

mortgage deed - Indian Stamp Act - Article 40(a) - The court examines the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act and the definition of a mortgage deed. It concludes that the instrument in question is not a mortgage deed as there was no transfer or creation of a right over specified property at the time of execution. The property over which mortgage rights could be claimed was non-existent as the film was still under production. The court also emphasizes that the property must be clearly defined and capable of identification at the time of execution to be considered 'specified property'. The court rejects the argument that future property can be the subject of immediate transfer.

Fact of the Case:

The instrument in question is a reference under S. 57 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, to determine whether it is a mortgage with possession or an agreement. The instrument is a record of a transaction in the film trade, where the film producer grants distribution rights to the financier. The instrument secures the financier's advance by giving them specified rights over the film. The instrument is signed by the producers and distributors and is stamped as an agreement.

Finding of the Court:

The court examines the provisions of the Indian Stamp Act and the definition of a mortgage deed. It concludes that the instrument in question is not a mortgage deed as there was no transfer or creation of a right over specified property at the time of execution. The property over which mortgage rights could be claimed was non-existent as the film was still under production. The court also emphasizes that the property must be clearly defined and capable of identification at the time of execution to be considered 'specified property'. The court rejects the argument that future property can be the subject of immediate transfer.

Ratio Decidendi: The instrument in question is not a mortgage deed as defined in the Indian Stamp Act. It is only an agreement.

Result: The court answers the reference by stating that the instrument is not a mortgage deed and is chargeable as an agreement. No order as to costs.

Judgement

NATESAN, J. :- This is a reference by the Chief Controlling Revenue Authority, Madras, under S. 57 of the Indian Stamp Act, 1899, for our opinion whether the instrument in question is a mortgage with possession coming under Art. 40(a) of Schedule I of the Indian Stamp Act or an agreement.

2. The instrument styled as an agreement, is the record of a transaction common in the film trade, whereby the film producer raises finance for a film under production granting distribution rights in specified territories to the financier termed, the distributor. The instrument secures to the distributor the realisation of his advance by covenants giving him specified rights over the film. It generally specifies the title of the film and also names of prominent artistes, featuring or expected to feature in the film. The instrument in question under consideration has been entered into by Messrs. Sudarsanam Pictures, Film Producers, with Messrs. Gee Pictures (P.), Ltd., film distributors, in respect of a Tamil talkie entitled "Aval Yar". The document provides for the advance of a sum of Rs. 50,000, by the distributors to the producers, the amount to be paid in four instalments, the final instalment, a sum of Rs. 20,000, being payable against delivery of the prints, that is, positive prints for exhibition. The producers grant to the distributors the exclusive rights of exhibition, distribution and exploitation of the picture in specified territories for a period of five yea'-s. Mutual covenants are found for the protection o f the respective in- of the producer and the distributor. There is provision for the distributor having commission on the realisations from the exhibition of the film. The operative part of the instrument, material for our purpose, is found in the following clauses :-

"The producers hereby grant the distributors the exclusive rights of exhibition, distribution and exploitation of the said picture for the area referred to hereinabove for a period of five (5) years from the date of its first release in the said area. The producers shall' deliver to the distributors three positive prints of the said picture for distribution, with three sets of photo cards, three sets of enlargements, three sets of slides and other lean publication. The producers shall, subject to availability of raw stock, prepare and supply to the distributors as many extra prints as the distributors may require for which the distributors shall advance to the producers the necessary amounts towards the cost of the prints and debit the amount to the account of the producers. . . . The distributors shall have the first and paramount charge on the nett realisations. The distributors shall be entitled in the first instance to appropriate themselves the commission due to them from the realisations. The balance of the net realisations shall thereafter be appropriated towards the recovery of all advances 'made by the distributors. When all the advances and payments made by the distributors shall have been recovered as aforesaid, the distributors shall every month remit the net realisations less their commission on or before the 15th of the succeeding mouth. The distributors shall furnish monthly statement of account of realisations to the producers. . . . The distributors shall have the first charge over the distribution, exhibition and exploitation right of the said picture for the said distribution area, the realisations therefrom and of the copies of the picture supplied hereunder until the amount due to the distributors is fully discharged. . . . On the expiration of the period of distribution the distributors shall return to the producers all the prints of the said picture along with the lean publicities in the then existing conditions. If, within one year from the date of the first release of the said picture, the amounts advanced by the distributors are not fully collected, the producers shall be entitled to repay to the distributors the amounts standin





















Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top