Madras High Court
KRISHNASWAMY REDDY
Daniel Hailey Walcott - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Decided On : 08/02/1967
None
Fact of the Case:
The appellants in both these appeals, Daniel Hailey Walcott and Jean Claude Donze were separately tried on various charges by the Sessions Judge, Madras. The facts of the case which are almost admitted are briefly as follows; the appellant is a national of the United States of America. He landed at Meenambakkam Aerodrome, Madras, at about 6-30 P.M. on 31-12-1985 from Air Ceylon Flight A. E. 207 from Colombo with the British passport in the name of one B. P. C. Comyn, a British subject. It appears that he had visited this country on prior occasions. A brief history of those visits may be necessary to be noted for appreciating one of the charges under which he had been convicted.
Finding of the Court:
The appellant has been convicted under Sec. 5(1) read with S. 5(3) and S. 14 of the Foreigners Act, 1946 (Act 31 of 1946). It is alleged that the appellant having entered India during January 1962 calling himself as Daniel Hailey Walcott and having been ordinarily known as such, he entered India again through the Meenambakkam Airport on 31-12-1963 under an assumed name "Barry Philips Charles Comyn"and used that name without any licence and permission of the Government of India. In respect of tills charge, the learned counsel appearing for the appellant contended that the appellant has not committed the offence under this charge as the prosecution has not proved the ingredients and the requirements of the provisions of the Foreigners Act with which the appellant was charged.
Issues: None
Ratio Decidendi: The emphasis under Sec. 5(1), in my opinion, is that a foreigner while in India shall not assume or use any other name other than that by which he was ordinarily known. If a foreigner enters into this country and remains in this country. even for a short period, with a known name and he subsequently assumes or uses another name for any purpose without the permission of the Central Government, he will come within Sec. 5(3). If a foreigner visits this country with a known name and returns to his country and changes his name in his country according to the law and procedure of that country and if he comes again with that assumed name to this country and uses that assumed name, it cannot be said that he had assumed or used the name while he was in this country.
Final Decision: The appeal is dismissed with the above modifications.
2. C. A. 810 of 1966. The appellant Daniel Hailey Walcott was charged under ten counts, of which he was convicted on counts Nos. 1 and 3 to 10 and was sentenced to various terms of imprisonment, the maximum being R. I., for five years, the sentences to run concurrently by the Sessions Judge, Madras.
3. The facts of the case which are almost admitted are briefly as follows; the appellant is a national of the United States of America. He landed at Meenambakkam Aerodrome, Madras, at about 6-30 P.M. on 31-12-1985 from Air Ceylon Flight A. E. 207 from Colombo with the British passport in the name of one B. P. C. Comyn, a British subject. It appears that he had visited this country on prior occasions. A brief history of those visits may be necessary to be noted for appreciating one of the charges under which he had been convicted.
4. On 15-1-1962, the appellant landed at Santa Cruz Aerodrome, Bombay, with a passport describing himself as Daniel Hailey Walcott a United States National. On 23-1-1962, he left for London. It appears, during that visit, before he left the country he represented to the officials of Air India, New Delhi, that he was the President of the Trans Atlantic Airlines Ltd. and in that capacity negotiated with them in respect of charter flights for transport of goods between India and Afghanistan, and subsequently an agreement was entered into between the appellant describing himself as Daniel Hailey Walcott and Air India in relation to charter flights. In pursuance of the agreement the appellant employed on Shri Nurcharan (P.W. 10) as an aircraft mechanic between February and September 1962.
5. The appellant came back to India and landed at Palam Airport, New Delhi, on 8-3-1962, describing himself as Daniel Hailey Walcott, Jr. with a residential permit valid till 25-4-1962. From 13-4-1962, for about 5 or 6 months, the appellant stayed with his wife in the Ashoka Hotel, New Delhi, registering himself as Daniel Hailey Walcott, a United States National. While he was staying in Ashoka Hotel, the Delhi Police registered a case against him under the Indian Arms Act and filed charge-sheet before the Sub Divisional Magistrate, New Delhi. In connection with that case, the appellant was detained in the Central jail, New Delhi, from 25-9-1962 to 1-12-1962. He was subsequently released on bail and he left India. The Assistant Collector of Customs, New Delhi, filed a complaint on 22-2-1963 against the appellant under the Sea Customs Act, and the Import and Export Control Act of 1947. On 24-2-1963, the appellant landed at the Palam Airport and left India on 2-3-1963 and he returned in April to New Delhi. The appellant was convicted by the Sub Divisional Magistrate, New Delhi, on the complaint given by the Assistant Collector of Customs and sentenced to R. I., for six months and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000. He was detained in the Central Jail from 23-8-1963 till 11-9-1963 when he was released by the order of the appellate Court which reduced the sentence to the period already undergone and increased the fine amount. On 23-9-1963, he left New Delhi. After he left, it appears that the Delhi Police registered another complaint against him and obtained a non-bailable warrant to arrest the appellant. As the appellant absconded from this country, a proclamation was issued on 20-10-1964 declaring the appellant as a proclaimed offender. Another case was subsequently registered under the provisions of the Foreigner's Registration Act and the Defence of India Act suspecting the appellant as one of the aliens who entered this country by using a forged passport. A warrant was issued by the Additional Chief Presidency
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.