NATESAN
Rajalakshmi – Appellant
Versus
Minor Ramachandran – Respondent
2. The suit properties originally belonged to one Anjalai Animal, wife of Arumugha Padayachi, the putative father of the plaintiffs in the suit. They are the children of Arumugha Padayachi by his concubine Marimuthu Animal. Anjalai Ammal having no male issue, under the deed of settlement Ex. A. 1 dated 25-10-1955, settled the suit properties on the minor plaintiffs. The deed of settlement refers to Arumugha Padayachi as their protector, father and guardian, and it is recited therein that the properties which had been settled on them are on their behalf placed in possession of their guardian, the said Arumugha Padayachi. Certain conditions are imposed under the deed enjoining the settles to maintain Arumugha Padayachi during his lifetime, the properties to be taken by the plaintiffs after his lifetime, with absolute rights. A charge is provided in favour of Arumugha Padayachi for his maintenance. The settlement deed referring to a mort
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.