SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Mad) 228

P.S.KAILASAM
Avudayappan Chettiar – Appellant
Versus
Kanthimathi Ammal – Respondent


Advocates:
T.M. Haniachandran and N. Varadarajan, for Appellant; K. Hariharan, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGMENT : This is an appeal by the third defendant in O. S. No. 322 of 1953 against the order of the District judge. Tirunelveli, in C. M. A. 92 of 1961, directing execution against the third defendant for mesne profits.

2. The properties in dispute originally belonged to one Isakki Periumal. He left a will dated 16-2-1930 by which he gave a life estate in the suit properties to his wife and the remainder to a trust. The widow executed a settlement in favour of the first defendant and another, by deed dated 16-9-1944. The first defendant sold items 1, 2 and 3 to the second defendant on 18-2-1952. The second defendant sold some of the properties to the sixth defendant. The third defendant, who is the appellant herein purchased 85 frees from the second defendant. The trees were on items 1, 2 and 3. Defendants 4 and 5 are the lessees of items 1 to 3. The (Madalayam) (rule filed the suit, O. S. 322 of 1953, for recovery of the items of properly which Isakki Perumal bequeathed to it by will dated 16-9-1930. The suit was contested by defendants 1, 2 and 6. A decree as prayed for by the plaintiff was passed on 31-1-1955, and an appeal by defendants 1, 2 and 6. A.S. 11 of 1956, wa








Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top