SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Mad) 124

P.S.KAILASAM
Voora Rangamma – Appellant
Versus
Voora Venkatarajalu Chetty – Respondent


Advocates:
K. Parasaram, for Appellant; K.S. Desikan and C. Venkatesan, for Respondent.

Judgement

JUDGMENT : The plaintiff is the appellant. She filed the suit for enhanced maintenance against her stepson. Plaintiff is the third wife of Voora Gurumurthi and the defendant is the son of the said Gurumurthi by his second wife. Gurumurthi died at Madras on 19-12-1930 leaving behind him his son, the defendant and the plaintiff his widow and joint family properties consisting of a house No. 11. Reddiraman St. G. T. Madras and a shop in Pycrofts Road, Triplicane, items 1 and 2 of the plaint schedule. The plaintiff and the defendant entered into a settlement deed Ex. A. 1, dated 6-1-1931. The settlement deed provided that the plaintiff in full satisfaction of her right to maintenance, residence etc., over the joint family properties, would receive for her natural life Rs. 20 per mensem every month from February 1931 and receive two sarees of the value of Rs. 150 per annum. She was also given the option to reside in the family house or to receive a sum of Rs. 5 per mensem. The settlement further provided that the plaintiff would have no manner of right, title or interest or claim over the assets of the deceased Voora Gurumurthi except the rights created by the settlement deed.

2







Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top